What is the difference in mining and quarrying, value added between Gambia and Zimbabwe?

156.12 million constant LCU, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Zimbabwe?

17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gambia vs Zimbabwe: Mining and quarrying, value added

Gambia

579.61 million constant LCU

in 2011

Zimbabwe

735.72 million constant LCU

in 2011

Gambia rank

38th

Zimbabwe rank

37th

Mining and quarrying, value added over time

Gambia
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 735.72 million constant LCU against 579.61 million constant LCU in Gambia, a difference of 156.12 million constant LCU.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Gambia ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 45 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gambia	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	37.66 million constant LCU	618.85 million constant LCU	581.19 million constant LCU	Zimbabwe
2000s	290.24 million constant LCU	623.01 million constant LCU	332.76 million constant LCU	Zimbabwe
2010s	575.07 million constant LCU	636.96 million constant LCU	61.89 million constant LCU	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mining and quarrying, value added, Gambia or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 735.72 million constant LCU against 579.61 million constant LCU in Gambia as of 2011.
What is the difference in mining and quarrying, value added between Gambia and Zimbabwe?: 156.12 million constant LCU, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Zimbabwe?: 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
How do Gambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for mining and quarrying, value added?: Gambia ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 45 countries.
Where does this data come from?: World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Zimbabwe: Mining and quarrying, value added. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-constant-lcu/gambia-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-constant-lcu/gambia-the/zimbabwe/">Gambia vs Zimbabwe: Mining and quarrying, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU)
Unit: constant LCU
Source: World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 45 places, 1,347 data points, 1965–2011
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

Value added in mining and quarrying is defined as the value of output of the mining and quarrying industries less the value of intermediate consumption (intermediate inputs). Mining and quarrying is a subset of industry (ISIC 10-14). Data are in constant local currency.