Eswatini vs Tunisia: Mining and quarrying, value added

Eswatini
12.10 million constant LCU
in 2011
Tunisia
115.27 million constant LCU
in 2009
Eswatini rank
43rd
Tunisia rank
41st

Mining and quarrying, value added over time

  • Eswatini
  • Tunisia
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196519882011

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 115.27 million constant LCU against 12.10 million constant LCU in Eswatini, a difference of 103.17 million constant LCU.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 9.5 times Eswatini's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 41st of 45 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 31.18 million constant LCU 687.86 million constant LCU 656.68 million constant LCU Tunisia
1980s 27.36 million constant LCU 845.74 million constant LCU 818.38 million constant LCU Tunisia
1990s 46.97 million constant LCU 107.88 million constant LCU 60.91 million constant LCU Tunisia
2000s 22.61 million constant LCU 130.95 million constant LCU 108.34 million constant LCU Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mining and quarrying, value added, Eswatini or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 115.27 million constant LCU against 12.10 million constant LCU in Eswatini as of 2009.
What is the difference in mining and quarrying, value added between Eswatini and Tunisia?
103.17 million constant LCU, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tunisia?
39 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2009.
How do Eswatini and Tunisia rank globally for mining and quarrying, value added?
Eswatini ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 41st of 45 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tunisia: Mining and quarrying, value added. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-constant-lcu/eswatini/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-constant-lcu/eswatini/tunisia/">Eswatini vs Tunisia: Mining and quarrying, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
45 places, 1,347 data points, 1965–2011
Last refreshed

Value added in mining and quarrying is defined as the value of output of the mining and quarrying industries less the value of intermediate consumption (intermediate inputs). Mining and quarrying is a subset of industry (ISIC 10-14). Data are in constant local currency.