What is the difference in mining and quarrying, value added between Egypt and Rwanda?

4.07 billion constant LCU, with Egypt ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Rwanda?

25 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Egypt vs Rwanda: Mining and quarrying, value added

Egypt

18.53 billion constant LCU

in 2011

Rwanda

14.46 billion constant LCU

in 2011

Egypt rank

22nd

Rwanda rank

24th

Mining and quarrying, value added over time

Egypt
Rwanda

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 18.53 billion constant LCU against 14.46 billion constant LCU in Rwanda, a difference of 4.07 billion constant LCU.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 24th of 45 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Egypt	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1980s	4.88 billion constant LCU	1.53 billion constant LCU	3.35 billion constant LCU	Egypt
1990s	12.64 billion constant LCU	1.60 billion constant LCU	11.04 billion constant LCU	Egypt
2000s	14.61 billion constant LCU	10.25 billion constant LCU	4.36 billion constant LCU	Egypt
2010s	18.34 billion constant LCU	12.06 billion constant LCU	6.28 billion constant LCU	Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mining and quarrying, value added, Egypt or Rwanda?: Egypt, at 18.53 billion constant LCU against 14.46 billion constant LCU in Rwanda as of 2011.
What is the difference in mining and quarrying, value added between Egypt and Rwanda?: 4.07 billion constant LCU, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Rwanda?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2011.
How do Egypt and Rwanda rank globally for mining and quarrying, value added?: Egypt ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 24th of 45 countries.
Where does this data come from?: World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Rwanda: Mining and quarrying, value added. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-constant-lcu/egypt-arab-rep/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-constant-lcu/egypt-arab-rep/rwanda/">Egypt vs Rwanda: Mining and quarrying, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU)
Unit: constant LCU
Source: World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 45 places, 1,347 data points, 1965–2011
Last refreshed: 07 August 2026

Value added in mining and quarrying is defined as the value of output of the mining and quarrying industries less the value of intermediate consumption (intermediate inputs). Mining and quarrying is a subset of industry (ISIC 10-14). Data are in constant local currency.