What is the difference in mining and quarrying, value added between Egypt and Malawi?

3.63 billion constant LCU, with Egypt ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Malawi?

17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Egypt vs Malawi: Mining and quarrying, value added

Egypt

18.53 billion constant LCU

in 2011

Malawi

14.90 billion constant LCU

in 2011

Egypt rank

22nd

Malawi rank

23rd

Mining and quarrying, value added over time

Egypt
Malawi

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 18.53 billion constant LCU against 14.90 billion constant LCU in Malawi, a difference of 3.63 billion constant LCU.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 22nd and Malawi ranks 23rd of 45 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Egypt	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1990s	13.41 billion constant LCU	854.41 million constant LCU	12.56 billion constant LCU	Egypt
2000s	14.61 billion constant LCU	3.74 billion constant LCU	10.87 billion constant LCU	Egypt
2010s	18.34 billion constant LCU	14.90 billion constant LCU	3.44 billion constant LCU	Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mining and quarrying, value added, Egypt or Malawi?: Egypt, at 18.53 billion constant LCU against 14.90 billion constant LCU in Malawi as of 2011.
What is the difference in mining and quarrying, value added between Egypt and Malawi?: 3.63 billion constant LCU, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Malawi?: 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
How do Egypt and Malawi rank globally for mining and quarrying, value added?: Egypt ranks 22nd and Malawi ranks 23rd of 45 countries.
Where does this data come from?: World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Malawi: Mining and quarrying, value added. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-constant-lcu/egypt-arab-rep/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-constant-lcu/egypt-arab-rep/malawi/">Egypt vs Malawi: Mining and quarrying, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU)
Unit: constant LCU
Source: World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 45 places, 1,347 data points, 1965–2011
Last refreshed: 07 August 2026

Value added in mining and quarrying is defined as the value of output of the mining and quarrying industries less the value of intermediate consumption (intermediate inputs). Mining and quarrying is a subset of industry (ISIC 10-14). Data are in constant local currency.