Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
3.13
in 2022
Melanesia
0.5632
in 2022
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
4th
Melanesia rank
1st

Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Melanesia
1234200020112022

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 3.13 against 0.5632 in Melanesia, a difference of 2.57.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.6 times Melanesia's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and Melanesia ranks 1st of 34 groups.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Melanesia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.82 0.8567 2.97 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 3.39 0.8282 2.56 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3.3 0.5769 2.72 Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher material footprint per unit of gdp, by type of raw material, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Melanesia?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 3.13 against 0.5632 in Melanesia as of 2022.
What is the difference in material footprint per unit of gdp, by type of raw material between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
2.57, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia rank globally for material footprint per unit of gdp, by type of raw material?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and Melanesia ranks 1st of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2020 United States dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/material-footprint-per-unit-of-gdp-by-type-of-raw-material-kilograms-per-constant-2020/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/material-footprint-per-unit-of-gdp-by-type-of-raw-material-kilograms-per-constant-2020/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/melanesia/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2020 United States dollar)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
36 places, 828 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed