Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern Africa: Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material

Australia and New Zealand
0.5612
in 2022
Eastern Africa
3.41
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Eastern Africa rank
3rd

Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Eastern Africa
12345200020112022

How they compare

Eastern Africa currently reports 3.41 against 0.5612 in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 2.85.

That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 6.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Eastern Africa has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Eastern Africa ranks 3rd of 2 countries.

Eastern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Eastern Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 0.7877 4.93 4.15 Eastern Africa
2010s 0.6484 3.91 3.26 Eastern Africa
2020s 0.5744 3.55 2.98 Eastern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher material footprint per unit of gdp, by type of raw material, Australia and New Zealand or Eastern Africa?
Eastern Africa, at 3.41 against 0.5612 in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in material footprint per unit of gdp, by type of raw material between Australia and New Zealand and Eastern Africa?
2.85, with Eastern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Eastern Africa?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Eastern Africa rank globally for material footprint per unit of gdp, by type of raw material?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Eastern Africa ranks 3rd of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2020 United States dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern Africa: Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/material-footprint-per-unit-of-gdp-by-type-of-raw-material-kilograms-per-constant-2020/australia-and-new-zealand/eastern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/material-footprint-per-unit-of-gdp-by-type-of-raw-material-kilograms-per-constant-2020/australia-and-new-zealand/eastern-africa/">Australia and New Zealand vs Eastern Africa: Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Material footprint per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2020 United States dollar)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
36 places, 828 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed