Brazil vs Libya: Manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre
Brazil
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
0 units per square kilometre
in 2017
Brazil rank
195th
Libya rank
194th
Manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre over time
- Brazil
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 195th and Libya ranks 194th of 200 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre, Brazil or Libya?
- Libya, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2017.
- What is the difference in manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre between Brazil and Libya?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Libya?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Brazil and Libya rank globally for manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 195th and Libya ranks 194th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing value added to gdp, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Manufacturing value added to gdp divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.