Pakistan vs Rwanda: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre

Pakistan
59,603 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
51,453 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
99th
Rwanda rank
102nd

Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Pakistan
  • Rwanda
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 59,603 current US$ per square kilometre against 51,453 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 8,150 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 99th and Rwanda ranks 102nd of 200 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1,310 current US$ per square kilometre 200.41 current US$ per square kilometre 1,110 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 2,261 current US$ per square kilometre 2,390 current US$ per square kilometre 129.33 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 5,916 current US$ per square kilometre 9,436 current US$ per square kilometre 3,519 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 10,696 current US$ per square kilometre 9,471 current US$ per square kilometre 1,225 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 21,119 current US$ per square kilometre 11,028 current US$ per square kilometre 10,090 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 45,898 current US$ per square kilometre 25,425 current US$ per square kilometre 20,473 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 56,240 current US$ per square kilometre 44,773 current US$ per square kilometre 11,468 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre, Pakistan or Rwanda?
Pakistan, at 59,603 current US$ per square kilometre against 51,453 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre between Pakistan and Rwanda?
8,150 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Rwanda?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Rwanda rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?
Pakistan ranks 99th and Rwanda ranks 102nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Rwanda: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/rwanda/">Pakistan vs Rwanda: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 9,503 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.