Morocco vs Tunisia: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre

Morocco
51,673 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
47,081 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
101st
Tunisia rank
104th

Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Morocco
  • Tunisia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196519942023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 51,673 current US$ per square kilometre against 47,081 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 4,592 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Morocco ahead.

Morocco ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 104th of 200 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,149 current US$ per square kilometre 600.51 current US$ per square kilometre 548.12 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 3,226 current US$ per square kilometre 2,565 current US$ per square kilometre 660.82 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 8,456 current US$ per square kilometre 8,311 current US$ per square kilometre 145.39 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 15,734 current US$ per square kilometre 19,407 current US$ per square kilometre 3,673 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 24,547 current US$ per square kilometre 34,097 current US$ per square kilometre 9,550 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 38,059 current US$ per square kilometre 43,510 current US$ per square kilometre 5,451 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 47,156 current US$ per square kilometre 43,375 current US$ per square kilometre 3,780 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre, Morocco or Tunisia?
Morocco, at 51,673 current US$ per square kilometre against 47,081 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre between Morocco and Tunisia?
4,592 current US$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Tunisia rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?
Morocco ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 104th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Tunisia: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/morocco/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/morocco/tunisia/">Morocco vs Tunisia: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 9,503 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.