Malta vs Netherlands: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
4.13 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands
3.53 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
9th
Netherlands rank
10th

Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Netherlands
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196919962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 4.13 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.53 million current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 596,360 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Netherlands ahead.

Malta ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 10th of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 5 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 390,369 current US$ per square kilometre 523,076 current US$ per square kilometre 132,707 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 1.08 million current US$ per square kilometre 893,554 current US$ per square kilometre 184,434 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 1.99 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.67 million current US$ per square kilometre 315,154 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 2.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.24 million current US$ per square kilometre 461,939 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 3.07 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.61 million current US$ per square kilometre 464,731 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 3.75 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.25 million current US$ per square kilometre 491,252 current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or Netherlands?
Malta, at 4.13 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.53 million current US$ per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and Netherlands?
596,360 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Netherlands?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and Netherlands rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 10th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Netherlands: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/">Malta vs Netherlands: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 9,503 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.