Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Viet Nam: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
5,586 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Viet Nam
333,737 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
46th
Viet Nam rank
43rd

Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Viet Nam
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199020062023

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 333,737 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,586 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 328,151 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 59.7 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 46th and Viet Nam ranks 43rd of 47 groups.

Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2000s 2,291 current US$ per square kilometre 48,944 current US$ per square kilometre 46,653 current US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam
2010s 3,638 current US$ per square kilometre 162,738 current US$ per square kilometre 159,100 current US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam
2020s 5,070 current US$ per square kilometre 302,450 current US$ per square kilometre 297,380 current US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 333,737 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,586 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Viet Nam?
328,151 current US$ per square kilometre, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Viet Nam?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Viet Nam rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 46th and Viet Nam ranks 43rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Viet Nam: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/viet-nam/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Viet Nam: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 9,503 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.