How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and China?

20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs China: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre

Aruba

490,306 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

China

486,804 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Aruba rank

33rd

China rank

34th

Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre over time

Aruba
China

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 490,306 current US$ per square kilometre against 486,804 current US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 3,502 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 33rd and China ranks 34th of 200 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	China	Difference	Ahead
2000s	843,059 current US$ per square kilometre	115,203 current US$ per square kilometre	727,855 current US$ per square kilometre	Aruba
2010s	529,773 current US$ per square kilometre	326,615 current US$ per square kilometre	203,158 current US$ per square kilometre	Aruba
2020s	423,480 current US$ per square kilometre	479,615 current US$ per square kilometre	56,136 current US$ per square kilometre	China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre, Aruba or China?: Aruba, at 490,306 current US$ per square kilometre against 486,804 current US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre between Aruba and China?: 3,502 current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and China?: 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Aruba and China rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current us$), per square kilometre?: Aruba ranks 33rd and China ranks 34th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs China: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/china/">Aruba vs China: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 248 places, 9,503 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Manufacturing, value added (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.