Mauritius vs Rwanda: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Mauritius
36.68 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
59.69 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
24th
Rwanda rank
21st

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Rwanda
020.0M40.0M60.0M196519942023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 59.69 million current LCU per square kilometre against 36.68 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 23.01 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.6 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 382,143 current LCU per square kilometre 433,117 current LCU per square kilometre 50,974 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 1.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 834,886 current LCU per square kilometre 745,903 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 7.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.20 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 16.45 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.85 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.60 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 26.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.25 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 30.71 million current LCU per square kilometre 46.60 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.89 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 59.69 million current LCU per square kilometre against 36.68 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Rwanda?
23.01 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Rwanda?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Rwanda rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Rwanda: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/rwanda/">Mauritius vs Rwanda: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.