Guatemala vs Malaysia: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Guatemala
1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
1.28 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
99th
Malaysia rank
96th

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Malaysia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 1.28 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 209,860 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Malaysia ahead.

Guatemala ranks 99th and Malaysia ranks 96th of 200 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 2,138 current LCU per square kilometre 3,505 current LCU per square kilometre 1,367 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 5,670 current LCU per square kilometre 14,146 current LCU per square kilometre 8,477 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 19,441 current LCU per square kilometre 47,515 current LCU per square kilometre 28,073 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 107,561 current LCU per square kilometre 177,407 current LCU per square kilometre 69,846 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 362,691 current LCU per square kilometre 438,801 current LCU per square kilometre 76,110 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 655,640 current LCU per square kilometre 787,002 current LCU per square kilometre 131,363 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 925,297 current LCU per square kilometre 1.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 228,239 current LCU per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 1.28 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Malaysia?
209,860 current LCU per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malaysia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Malaysia rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 99th and Malaysia ranks 96th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Malaysia: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malaysia/">Guatemala vs Malaysia: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.