Eswatini vs Nepal: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Eswatini
1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
1.70 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
91st
Nepal rank
89th

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Nepal
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196519942023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 1.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 252,880 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Nepal ahead.

Eswatini ranks 91st and Nepal ranks 89th of 200 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 386.05 current LCU per square kilometre 1,683 current LCU per square kilometre 1,296 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 2,230 current LCU per square kilometre 4,003 current LCU per square kilometre 1,773 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 12,112 current LCU per square kilometre 17,818 current LCU per square kilometre 5,706 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 108,699 current LCU per square kilometre 128,190 current LCU per square kilometre 19,492 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 389,950 current LCU per square kilometre 319,305 current LCU per square kilometre 70,645 current LCU per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 855,944 current LCU per square kilometre 880,852 current LCU per square kilometre 24,908 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 1.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 259,572 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Nepal?
Nepal, at 1.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Nepal?
252,880 current LCU per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nepal?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Nepal rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 91st and Nepal ranks 89th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Nepal: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/nepal/">Eswatini vs Nepal: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.