El Salvador vs Lesotho: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

El Salvador
212,061 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
181,874 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
144th
Lesotho rank
146th

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Lesotho
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196419932023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 212,061 current LCU per square kilometre against 181,874 current LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 30,187 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 144th and Lesotho ranks 146th of 200 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 9,439 current LCU per square kilometre 40.18 current LCU per square kilometre 9,399 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 18,441 current LCU per square kilometre 210.99 current LCU per square kilometre 18,230 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 32,882 current LCU per square kilometre 1,759 current LCU per square kilometre 31,123 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 75,001 current LCU per square kilometre 11,179 current LCU per square kilometre 63,822 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 123,382 current LCU per square kilometre 71,322 current LCU per square kilometre 52,060 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 178,285 current LCU per square kilometre 127,154 current LCU per square kilometre 51,131 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 203,089 current LCU per square kilometre 191,167 current LCU per square kilometre 11,922 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Lesotho?
El Salvador, at 212,061 current LCU per square kilometre against 181,874 current LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Lesotho?
30,187 current LCU per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Lesotho?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Lesotho rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 144th and Lesotho ranks 146th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Lesotho: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/lesotho/">El Salvador vs Lesotho: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.