Ecuador vs Latvia: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
64,492 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
69,183 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
171st
Latvia rank
170th

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 69,183 current LCU per square kilometre against 64,492 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 4,691 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 171st and Latvia ranks 170th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 19,907 current LCU per square kilometre 13,620 current LCU per square kilometre 6,287 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 24,698 current LCU per square kilometre 24,887 current LCU per square kilometre 189.01 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 50,892 current LCU per square kilometre 42,277 current LCU per square kilometre 8,615 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 57,710 current LCU per square kilometre 64,817 current LCU per square kilometre 7,107 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Latvia?
Latvia, at 69,183 current LCU per square kilometre against 64,492 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Latvia?
4,691 current LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 171st and Latvia ranks 170th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.