Chad vs South Africa: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chad
567,128 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
753,028 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
115th
South Africa rank
112th

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • South Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 753,028 current LCU per square kilometre against 567,128 current LCU per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 185,900 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 115th and South Africa ranks 112th of 200 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 6,707 current LCU per square kilometre 1,741 current LCU per square kilometre 4,966 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
1970s 15,601 current LCU per square kilometre 5,112 current LCU per square kilometre 10,489 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
1980s 36,131 current LCU per square kilometre 34,146 current LCU per square kilometre 1,986 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
1990s 59,156 current LCU per square kilometre 102,163 current LCU per square kilometre 43,007 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 121,517 current LCU per square kilometre 253,043 current LCU per square kilometre 131,526 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 480,666 current LCU per square kilometre 448,408 current LCU per square kilometre 32,257 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
2020s 605,326 current LCU per square kilometre 648,148 current LCU per square kilometre 42,822 current LCU per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chad or South Africa?
South Africa, at 753,028 current LCU per square kilometre against 567,128 current LCU per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chad and South Africa?
185,900 current LCU per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and South Africa?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and South Africa rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 115th and South Africa ranks 112th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs South Africa: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/south-africa/">Chad vs South Africa: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.