Argentina vs India: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
11.62 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
India
12.98 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
46th
India rank
44th

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • India
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 12.98 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.62 million current LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 1.36 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 46th and India ranks 44th of 200 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina India Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 17,136 current LCU per square kilometre 17,136 current LCU per square kilometre India
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 44,454 current LCU per square kilometre 44,454 current LCU per square kilometre India
1980s 38.23 current LCU per square kilometre 159,565 current LCU per square kilometre 159,527 current LCU per square kilometre India
1990s 16,376 current LCU per square kilometre 648,430 current LCU per square kilometre 632,054 current LCU per square kilometre India
2000s 40,285 current LCU per square kilometre 2.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.04 million current LCU per square kilometre India
2010s 383,823 current LCU per square kilometre 6.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.49 million current LCU per square kilometre India
2020s 5.17 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.38 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.22 million current LCU per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or India?
India, at 12.98 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.62 million current LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and India?
1.36 million current LCU per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and India?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Argentina and India rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 46th and India ranks 44th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs India: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/india/">Argentina vs India: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.