Argentina vs Denmark: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
11.62 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark
11.40 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
46th
Denmark rank
47th

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Denmark
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196519942023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 11.62 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.40 million current LCU per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 220,000 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Denmark ahead.

Argentina ranks 46th and Denmark ranks 47th of 200 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Denmark Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 429,399 current LCU per square kilometre 429,399 current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 928,523 current LCU per square kilometre 928,523 current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 38.23 current LCU per square kilometre 2.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.37 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 16,376 current LCU per square kilometre 3.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.72 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 40,285 current LCU per square kilometre 4.93 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.89 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 383,823 current LCU per square kilometre 6.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.83 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 5.17 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.82 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Denmark?
Argentina, at 11.62 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.40 million current LCU per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Denmark?
220,000 current LCU per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Denmark?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Denmark rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 46th and Denmark ranks 47th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Denmark: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/denmark/">Argentina vs Denmark: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.