Latvia vs Libya: Manufacturing, value added
Manufacturing, value added over time
- Latvia
- Libya
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 3.51 billion constant LCU against 2.67 billion constant LCU in Libya, a difference of 832.42 million constant LCU.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Libya ahead.
Latvia ranks 141st and Libya ranks 144th of 191 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.86 billion constant LCU | 4.71 billion constant LCU | 1.85 billion constant LCU | Libya |
| 2010s | 2.78 billion constant LCU | 2.95 billion constant LCU | 168.41 million constant LCU | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manufacturing, value added, Latvia or Libya?
- Latvia, at 3.51 billion constant LCU against 2.67 billion constant LCU in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in manufacturing, value added between Latvia and Libya?
- 832.42 million constant LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Libya?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Libya rank globally for manufacturing, value added?
- Latvia ranks 141st and Libya ranks 144th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) major division C and is defined as the physical or chemical transformation of materials or components into new products. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.