Latvia vs Panama: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Latvia
55,625 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
50,349 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
154th
Panama rank
157th

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Latvia
  • Panama
20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k197019962023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 55,625 constant LCU per square kilometre against 50,349 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 5,276 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Panama ahead.

Latvia ranks 154th and Panama ranks 157th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 30,158 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,942 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,784 constant LCU per square kilometre Panama
2000s 42,985 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,085 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,900 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 46,349 constant LCU per square kilometre 47,539 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,190 constant LCU per square kilometre Panama
2020s 56,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,565 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,906 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Latvia or Panama?
Latvia, at 55,625 constant LCU per square kilometre against 50,349 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Latvia and Panama?
5,276 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Latvia ranks 154th and Panama ranks 157th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Panama: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/latvia/panama/">Latvia vs Panama: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,197 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.