Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Kiribati
20,337 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
26,682 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
166th
Zimbabwe rank
163rd

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196919962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 26,682 constant LCU per square kilometre against 20,337 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 6,345 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Kiribati's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 187 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 4,291 constant LCU per square kilometre 21,544 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,252 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 6,089 constant LCU per square kilometre 27,947 constant LCU per square kilometre 21,858 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 8,167 constant LCU per square kilometre 35,130 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,964 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 10,281 constant LCU per square kilometre 22,067 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,786 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 14,452 constant LCU per square kilometre 28,551 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,099 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 19,827 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,985 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,158 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 26,682 constant LCU per square kilometre against 20,337 constant LCU per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
6,345 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Zimbabwe?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Zimbabwe rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/zimbabwe/">Kiribati vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,197 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.