India vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

India
13.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
13.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
32nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
31st

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • India
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 13.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 13.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre in India, a difference of 288,700 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

India ranks 32nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 31st of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 2.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre 89,869 constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 4.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 80,438 constant LCU per square kilometre India
2010s 8.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 62,182 constant LCU per square kilometre India
2020s 11.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre 616,825 constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, India or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 13.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 13.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between India and Tanzania, United Republic of?
288,700 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do India and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
India ranks 32nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 31st of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/india/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/india/tanzania/">India vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,197 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.