Finland vs New Zealand: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Finland
100,901 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
111,428 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
141st
New Zealand rank
138th

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • New Zealand
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k197519992023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 111,428 constant LCU per square kilometre against 100,901 constant LCU per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 10,527 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was New Zealand ahead.

Finland ranks 141st and New Zealand ranks 138th of 187 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 34,152 constant LCU per square kilometre 79,557 constant LCU per square kilometre 45,405 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 46,139 constant LCU per square kilometre 88,635 constant LCU per square kilometre 42,496 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 62,210 constant LCU per square kilometre 92,699 constant LCU per square kilometre 30,489 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 116,431 constant LCU per square kilometre 112,772 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,659 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2010s 109,915 constant LCU per square kilometre 112,689 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,775 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 107,729 constant LCU per square kilometre 115,830 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,101 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Finland or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 111,428 constant LCU per square kilometre against 100,901 constant LCU per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Finland and New Zealand?
10,527 constant LCU per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 141st and New Zealand ranks 138th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs New Zealand: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/new-zealand/">Finland vs New Zealand: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,197 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.