Ecuador vs Latvia: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
61,852 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
55,625 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
151st
Latvia rank
154th

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 61,852 constant LCU per square kilometre against 55,625 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 6,227 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 151st and Latvia ranks 154th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 30,960 constant LCU per square kilometre 30,158 constant LCU per square kilometre 801.94 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 39,418 constant LCU per square kilometre 42,985 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,567 constant LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 53,537 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,349 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,188 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 58,143 constant LCU per square kilometre 56,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,671 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Latvia?
Ecuador, at 61,852 constant LCU per square kilometre against 55,625 constant LCU per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Latvia?
6,227 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 151st and Latvia ranks 154th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,197 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.