Denmark vs Togo: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Denmark
11.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
11.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
38th
Togo rank
36th

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Togo
2.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M12.0M196619942023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 11.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 11.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 867,300 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 38th and Togo ranks 36th of 187 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and Togo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Togo Difference Ahead
1970s 3.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 4.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 5.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 5.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 620,477 constant LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 6.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre Togo
2020s 9.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Denmark or Togo?
Togo, at 11.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 11.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Denmark and Togo?
867,300 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Togo?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Togo rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 38th and Togo ranks 36th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Togo: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/denmark/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/denmark/togo/">Denmark vs Togo: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,197 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.