Central African Republic vs El Salvador: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
219,166 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
171,968 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
125th
El Salvador rank
128th

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • El Salvador
100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k196519942023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 219,166 constant LCU per square kilometre against 171,968 constant LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 47,198 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.3 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 125th and El Salvador ranks 128th of 187 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic El Salvador Difference Ahead
2000s 214,529 constant LCU per square kilometre 157,418 constant LCU per square kilometre 57,111 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 195,771 constant LCU per square kilometre 176,858 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,912 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 225,757 constant LCU per square kilometre 173,401 constant LCU per square kilometre 52,356 constant LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or El Salvador?
Central African Republic, at 219,166 constant LCU per square kilometre against 171,968 constant LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and El Salvador?
47,198 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and El Salvador?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and El Salvador rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 125th and El Salvador ranks 128th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs El Salvador: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/el-salvador/">Central African Republic vs El Salvador: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,197 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.