Canada vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Canada
25,425 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
26,682 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
164th
Zimbabwe rank
163rd

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Canada
  • Zimbabwe
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196919962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 26,682 constant LCU per square kilometre against 25,425 constant LCU per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 1,257 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Canada ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 23,043 constant LCU per square kilometre 36,826 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,783 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 25,881 constant LCU per square kilometre 22,067 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,814 constant LCU per square kilometre Canada
2010s 23,806 constant LCU per square kilometre 28,551 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,745 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 24,731 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,985 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,254 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Canada or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 26,682 constant LCU per square kilometre against 25,425 constant LCU per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Canada and Zimbabwe?
1,257 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Zimbabwe?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Canada and Zimbabwe rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/zimbabwe/">Canada vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,197 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.