Argentina vs Brazil: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
43,406 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
50,690 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
158th
Brazil rank
156th

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Brazil
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 50,690 constant LCU per square kilometre against 43,406 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 7,284 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 158th and Brazil ranks 156th of 187 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Brazil in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 22,374 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,664 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,710 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 28,651 constant LCU per square kilometre 27,508 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,143 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 28,186 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,477 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,291 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 30,878 constant LCU per square kilometre 42,380 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,502 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 35,197 constant LCU per square kilometre 51,608 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,412 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 44,911 constant LCU per square kilometre 55,728 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,817 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 41,642 constant LCU per square kilometre 50,852 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,210 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Brazil?
Brazil, at 50,690 constant LCU per square kilometre against 43,406 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Brazil?
7,284 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Brazil?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Brazil rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 158th and Brazil ranks 156th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Brazil: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/brazil/">Argentina vs Brazil: Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 7,197 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.