Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Manufacturing, value added

Hong Kong, China
3.77 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Latvia
3.55 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
93rd
Latvia rank
95th

Manufacturing, value added over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Latvia
2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B199520102025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 3.77 billion constant 2015 US$ against 3.55 billion constant 2015 US$ in Latvia, a difference of 216.99 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 95th of 185 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 4.08 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.71 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.38 billion constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 3.49 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.92 billion constant 2015 US$ 571.41 million constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 3.55 billion constant 2015 US$ 3.53 billion constant 2015 US$ 23.64 million constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
Hong Kong, China, at 3.77 billion constant 2015 US$ against 3.55 billion constant 2015 US$ in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
216.99 million constant 2015 US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for manufacturing, value added?
Hong Kong, China ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 95th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Manufacturing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/">Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Manufacturing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
220 places, 8,964 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) major division C and is defined as the physical or chemical transformation of materials or components into new products. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.