Pre-demographic dividend vs Singapore: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Pre-demographic dividend
0.0887 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Singapore
0.1506 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Pre-demographic dividend rank
29th
Singapore rank
26th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Pre-demographic dividend
  • Singapore
00.511.5196019922025

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.1506 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0887 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0619 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.7 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Singapore ahead.

Pre-demographic dividend ranks 29th and Singapore ranks 26th of 35 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pre-demographic dividend Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 0.3348 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4771 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1424 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Singapore
1990s 0.2621 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2885 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0264 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Singapore
2000s 0.1553 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2741 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1188 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Singapore
2010s 0.0844 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1886 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1042 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Singapore
2020s 0.0827 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1683 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0856 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Pre-demographic dividend or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.1506 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0887 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Pre-demographic dividend and Singapore?
0.0619 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pre-demographic dividend and Singapore?
45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
How do Pre-demographic dividend and Singapore rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Pre-demographic dividend ranks 29th and Singapore ranks 26th of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pre-demographic dividend vs Singapore: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pre-demographic-dividend/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pre-demographic-dividend/singapore/">Pre-demographic dividend vs Singapore: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 8,945 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.