Eswatini vs Republic of Korea: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Eswatini
0.3016 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Republic of Korea
0.292 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Eswatini rank
3rd
Republic of Korea rank
4th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Eswatini
  • Republic of Korea
0.20.40.60.8196019922025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.3016 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.292 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.0096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Eswatini ranks 3rd and Republic of Korea ranks 4th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Republic of Korea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4585 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.56 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1016 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Republic of Korea
1980s 0.4286 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3792 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0493 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1990s 0.4627 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2762 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1865 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2000s 0.3716 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3124 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0593 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2010s 0.2795 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2803 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Republic of Korea
2020s 0.3058 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2763 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0295 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Republic of Korea?
Eswatini, at 0.3016 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.292 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Republic of Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Republic of Korea?
0.0096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Republic of Korea?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Republic of Korea rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Eswatini ranks 3rd and Republic of Korea ranks 4th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Republic of Korea: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/korea-rep/">Eswatini vs Republic of Korea: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 8,945 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.