How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?

46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Namibia: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Chile

0.0808 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Namibia

0.0824 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chile rank

93rd

Namibia rank

91st

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Chile
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0824 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0808 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0.0016 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 91st of 185 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.351 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2184 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1326 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Chile
1990s	0.2381 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1773 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0608 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Chile
2000s	0.1785 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1605 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0181 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Chile
2010s	0.0949 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1099 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.015 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2020s	0.0872 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0975 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0103 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Chile or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.0824 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0808 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Chile and Namibia?: 0.0016 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?: 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Chile ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 91st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Namibia: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/namibia/">Chile vs Namibia: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 220 places, 8,945 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.