Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Botswana
0.0526 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.0499 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Botswana rank
133rd
Zimbabwe rank
136th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Botswana
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.8196519952025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0526 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0499 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0027 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Botswana ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 136th of 185 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.252 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7295 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4775 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1970s 0.2281 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5289 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3007 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1980s 0.1108 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3538 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2429 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0917 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4252 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3335 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0801 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3305 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2504 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0679 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1214 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0535 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0535 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0601 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0066 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
Botswana, at 0.0526 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0499 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
0.0027 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
57 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Botswana ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 136th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/zimbabwe/">Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 8,945 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.