Belarus vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Belarus
0.1586 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics
0.1077 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Belarus rank
21st
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
22nd

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Belarus
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
0.10.20.30.4199020072025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.1586 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1077 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0.0509 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Belarus ranks 21st and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 22nd of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Central Europe and the Baltics in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2391 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2464 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0073 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 0.2646 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1963 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0683 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Belarus
2010s 0.202 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1652 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0368 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Belarus
2020s 0.1913 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.134 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0574 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Belarus or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Belarus, at 0.1586 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1077 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Belarus and Central Europe and the Baltics?
0.0509 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Central Europe and the Baltics?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Belarus ranks 21st and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Belarus vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 8,945 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.