Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Slovenia
573,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
8,116 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia rank
29th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
29th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Slovenia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k198120022023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 573,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,116 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 565,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 70.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Slovenia ranks 29th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 29th of 183 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 244,828 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,472 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 240,357 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 357,603 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 352,200 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 436,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,197 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 429,760 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 559,934 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,745 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 552,189 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Slovenia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Slovenia, at 573,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,116 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
565,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Slovenia ranks 29th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 29th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/sub-saharan-africa/">Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.