OECD members vs Singapore: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

OECD members
217,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
112.29 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
4th
Singapore rank
1st

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • OECD members
  • Singapore
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 112.29 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 217,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 112.07 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 515.4 times OECD members's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 35 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 137,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35.88 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35.75 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 160,711 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 51.12 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 50.96 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 186,884 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 211,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 111.11 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 110.90 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, OECD members or Singapore?
Singapore, at 112.29 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 217,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between OECD members and Singapore?
112.07 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Singapore?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do OECD members and Singapore rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
OECD members ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 35 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Singapore: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/singapore/">OECD members vs Singapore: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.