New Zealand vs Norway: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

New Zealand
75,162 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
76,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
77th
Norway rank
75th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Norway
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197019962023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 76,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 75,162 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 926 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Norway ahead.

New Zealand ranks 77th and Norway ranks 75th of 183 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 53,663 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,835 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 59,787 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,250 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,538 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 62,529 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,460 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,069 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 76,069 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 67,692 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,377 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 76,013 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,649 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 78,131 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,820 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,311 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, New Zealand or Norway?
Norway, at 76,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 75,162 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between New Zealand and Norway?
926 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Norway?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Norway rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 77th and Norway ranks 75th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Norway: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/norway/">New Zealand vs Norway: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.