Kazakhstan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
9,832 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
9,371 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
140th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
141st

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k15.0k199820102023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 9,832 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 9,371 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 461 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 140th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 141st of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 5,485 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,906 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,421 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 7,120 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,454 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 333.84 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 9,282 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,257 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,025 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Kazakhstan, at 9,832 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 9,371 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
461 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 140th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 141st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Kazakhstan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.