Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
3.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
217,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
6th
OECD members rank
4th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • OECD members
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M199720102023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 3.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 217,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 3.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 15.8 times OECD members's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 6th and OECD members ranks 4th of 183 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China OECD members Difference Ahead
2000s 3.89 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 160,711 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.73 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 3.32 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 186,884 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 3.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 211,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.10 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or OECD members?
Hong Kong, China, at 3.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 217,871 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
3.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and OECD members rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 6th and OECD members ranks 4th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/">Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.