Finland vs Guatemala: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Finland
111,126 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
106,684 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
67th
Guatemala rank
68th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • Guatemala
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 111,126 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 106,684 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 4,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 67th and Guatemala ranks 68th of 183 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 36,785 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35,790 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 994.36 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 50,815 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,372 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 68,514 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48,549 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,965 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 128,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,257 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 65,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 121,053 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 81,771 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 39,282 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 118,646 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 101,544 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,102 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Finland or Guatemala?
Finland, at 111,126 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 106,684 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Finland and Guatemala?
4,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Guatemala?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Finland and Guatemala rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 67th and Guatemala ranks 68th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Guatemala: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/guatemala/">Finland vs Guatemala: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.