Eswatini vs Norway: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
82,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
76,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
74th
Norway rank
75th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Norway
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 82,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 76,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 6,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Norway ahead.

Eswatini ranks 74th and Norway ranks 75th of 183 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 6,702 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 54,893 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48,191 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 14,116 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,250 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 43,134 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 38,538 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,460 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,922 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 51,679 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 67,692 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,013 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 70,895 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,469 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 81,066 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,820 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,246 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Norway?
Eswatini, at 82,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 76,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Norway?
6,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Norway?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Norway rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 74th and Norway ranks 75th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Norway: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/norway/">Eswatini vs Norway: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.