El Salvador vs Sweden: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

El Salvador
176,469 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
189,279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
55th
Sweden rank
54th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Sweden
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196519942023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 189,279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 176,469 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 12,810 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 55th and Sweden ranks 54th of 183 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Sweden Difference Ahead
1980s 96,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 77,437 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,969 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 128,923 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 98,024 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 157,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 161,515 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,963 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 181,488 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 172,869 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,620 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 177,940 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 190,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,268 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Sweden?
Sweden, at 189,279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 176,469 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Sweden?
12,810 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sweden?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Sweden rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 55th and Sweden ranks 54th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Sweden: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sweden/">El Salvador vs Sweden: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.