Denmark vs IDA blend: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend
49,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
14th
IDA blend rank
12th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • IDA blend
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196619942023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 49,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 1.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 32.2 times IDA blend's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 14th and IDA blend ranks 12th of 183 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark IDA blend Difference Ahead
1980s 667,602 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,759 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 655,843 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 746,338 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 734,489 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 865,847 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 851,651 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 971,548 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,053 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 945,495 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 1.34 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 46,474 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.29 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or IDA blend?
Denmark, at 1.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 49,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and IDA blend?
1.56 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and IDA blend?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Denmark and IDA blend rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 14th and IDA blend ranks 12th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs IDA blend: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ida-blend/">Denmark vs IDA blend: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.