Chile vs Tonga: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Chile
36,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
34,485 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
104th
Tonga rank
105th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Tonga
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 36,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 34,485 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tonga, a difference of 2,313 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Tonga ahead.

Chile ranks 104th and Tonga ranks 105th of 183 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Tonga Difference Ahead
1970s 8,923 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,330 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,407 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tonga
1980s 11,044 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,436 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tonga
1990s 18,850 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,433 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,583 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 25,751 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,919 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2010s 33,304 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tonga
2020s 35,962 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,827 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 864.45 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Tonga?
Chile, at 36,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 34,485 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Tonga?
2,313 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tonga?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Chile and Tonga rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 104th and Tonga ranks 105th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Tonga: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/tonga/">Chile vs Tonga: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.