Central African Republic vs Greenland: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
718.68 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
116.27 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
181st
Greenland rank
183rd

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Greenland
02004006008001.0k200320132023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 718.68 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 116.27 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 602.41 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 6.2 times Greenland's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 181st and Greenland ranks 183rd of 183 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Greenland Difference Ahead
2000s 703.48 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 142.17 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 561.31 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 641.97 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 185.39 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 456.58 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 740.29 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 118.44 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 621.85 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Greenland?
Central African Republic, at 718.68 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 116.27 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Greenland?
602.41 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Greenland?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Greenland rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 181st and Greenland ranks 183rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Greenland: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/greenland/">Central African Republic vs Greenland: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.