Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
6,483 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
6,202 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
148th
Zimbabwe rank
149th

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196919962023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 6,483 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 6,202 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 281 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 183 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 867.66 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,674 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,806 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 1,162 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,496 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,334 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 1,683 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,166 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,484 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 3,073 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 4,662 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,637 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,975 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 6,025 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,040 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15.38 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Burkina Faso, at 6,483 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 6,202 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
281 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 8,498 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.