Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Manufacturing, value added
Manufacturing, value added over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 5.1% against 4.8% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 58th of 192 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.3% | -4.0% | 8.3% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 2.3% | -9.0% | 11.3% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 4.9% | 10.8% | 5.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 5.6% | -1.2% | 6.8% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manufacturing, value added, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 5.1% against 4.8% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in manufacturing, value added between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for manufacturing, value added?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 58th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Manufacturing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) major division C and is defined as the physical or chemical transformation of materials or components into new products. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.