Equatorial Guinea vs Greenland: Manufacturing, value added
Manufacturing, value added over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Greenland
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -12.7% against -14.9% in Greenland, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 190th and Greenland ranks 191st of 192 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.3% | 4.6% | 65.7% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -2.0% | 2.6% | 4.6% | Greenland |
| 2020s | -0.9% | 10.1% | 11.0% | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manufacturing, value added, Equatorial Guinea or Greenland?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -12.7% against -14.9% in Greenland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in manufacturing, value added between Equatorial Guinea and Greenland?
- 2.2%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Greenland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Greenland rank globally for manufacturing, value added?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 190th and Greenland ranks 191st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Manufacturing, value added (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Manufacturing includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) major division C and is defined as the physical or chemical transformation of materials or components into new products. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.